The era of the one and done in college basketball is in full bloom. The NCAA and the NBA implemented the rule where players coming out of high school had to be 19years of age and one year removed from high school. They did this to stop the influx of high school players entering the NBA draft, some high school players were not ready for the NBA and by entering the draft they now lost the opportunity to play college basketball. This rule would also help college basketball because the talented players would have to at least play a year of college basketball.

Personally, I believe this rule has its pros and cons, so I am on the fence when it comes to the rule. The reason I am on the fence is because I believe the rule can be improved upon to make it better for all parties involved but I will further address this later.

In this year NBA draft, there is a possibly that the first ten players selected maybe freshmen college players and more than half of the first round selection maybe freshmen players. Would any of them be first round picks if they came straight from high school? When you look at the mock draft all of them have Markell Fultz as the number one pick but when he was coming out of high school he was ranked number seven, according to ESPN 100. Being rank number seven is great but would it have been good enough to be selected in the first round?  Zach Collins from Gonzaga was ranked 37th coming out of high school and he is a potential first pick, he might not have been drafted at all coming of high school. In these case,  a year of college has benefited the players and the schools that they played for but there are also situations such as Harry Giles who was the number one player coming out of high school. Giles maybe a late first pick in this year’s draft, now I will admit his injury has affected his potential draft selection. What if Giles went straight from high school to the NBA would his potential draft selection be higher?

The way the rules are setup now is once a player signs with an agent he can no longer return to school, if he does not withdraw draft entry before a specific date he cannot return to school. These rules I believe can be improved, I would keep the rule if a player signs with agent he is not able to return to school, and instead the player should be able to hire an advisor. The advisor would talk to the NBA teams on behalf of the player and would advise the player if he should remain in the draft. The advisor’s contract with the player would expire on draft night, after draft night the player would be required to sign with a different agency if the advisor is associated with an agency. If a player is drafted in the second round and does not make the team or the team wants the player to play in NBDL, the player should have the opportunity to return to school and play college basketball but the player would lose his scholarship and must pay for school himself. The NBA team who drafted the player would retain the rights to the player. If the player is not drafted he should be able to return to school and retain his athletic scholarship. I believe all parties would benefit from this structure colleges would retain players for more than one year, players would get a chance to play and develop, NBA team would save money and still have the right to the players.

There was a point where I enjoyed college and high school basketball more than professional basketball. The college game seemed more competitive, there was strong conference such as the Big East, ACC, SEC, PAC 10 and Big Ten where all the teams were good and you had no idea who would win the game. Part of me wants college basketball to return to those days, it just seems like the era of the one and done will not allow the competitiveness of college basketball to return.